It’s a small world after all..

I just received a very interesting email. As those of you who have been following this blog know, I used to be a Peace Corps volunteer in Uzbekistan, and now I am a Peace Corps volunteer in Romania. Now for me, my exit from the country, though emotionally rough, was handled via a few days at a nice hotel in Tashkent and a plane ticket outta there. For some others, though, the situation was quite different. After the Uzbek government’s ruthless crackdown in the city of Andijan, many Uzbeks fled to Kyrgyzstan seeking asylum from the very murderers who had slaughtered their friends, family and townspeople. For the past two months, the refugees have been living in a state of limbo, unsure of their future; while officials in Tashkent continue to call for their extradition, other powerful forces, including international human rights organizations, have been protecting them from this fate. A return to Uzbekistan would signal for these individuals, at the very least, constant police harassment (greater than that to which ordinary law abiding citizens are already subject,) and more likely, beatings, torture or even death.

So I was overjoyed to hear the following news: Romania has just agreed to offer “temporary refuge” to the 400+ Uzbek refugees. To read the announcement, please Click Here. I am not entirely sure what the temporary refuge tag means, but I am well satisfied that this is a better place for the Uzbek refugees than Kyrgyzstan, itself a fragile nation. No doubt there are larger less altruistic moves behind this move. A speaker from the American Embassy here who talked to our training group told us that just recently the Romanian president called for a Bucharest, London, Washington axis. At the same time, this country is slated to join the European Union in 2007. So some international good will certainly won’t hurt either of these initiatives. I will follow this story and post updates here as they emerge.

As regards to life here in Râºnov, things move on. Romania is a strange place. While zoning out in language class today, I was pondering just what has been troubling me about the place for these past two months. I’ve come to conclude (and of course this will probably change with time,) that Romania is caught up in a great existential crisis. This is a country neither here nor there, trapped between a rural, homey, nationalistic past and a modern, global, high tech future. Each pole has its obvious advantages and drawbacks. There is something charming about old Romania – bunicas (grandmothers) wrapped up with layers of clothes trundling to the local piata (open air market) to haggle over fruit — the endless cooking in home kitchens, which become the hub of family life — a pace that leaves time for things to unfold as they will… But for the younger generation, while perhaps a romantic notion, it is one best fit for photography and festivals. The future they seek is not so Rockwellian, rather it is a European, or perhaps even global one. Travel, cars, phones, clothes, things, things, money, things!

And having only emerged from 45 years of brutal Communist rule in 1989, hugely fundamental disagreements remain as to what constitutes progress. At the summer camp I went to last week, the wife of one of the Romanian teachers was talking with us, and mentioned that she preferred life under the Communists. Being the good American I am, I was quite surprised to hear this. Why? we asked. The reason was simple. Back then, she said, the differences between ordinary people, her friends, family and town members, were not great. Now, she continued, class inequity surrounded her at every step, and the resulting stratification of society based on material wealth has left her feeling alienated. Truly, this is a tragic consequence of progress.

And though I can’t really ever understand how it feels to be there, I can see what she refers to every day. Walk down the street and some people are pushing their old cars from the 1970’s while others speed around them in the latest Volvo SUVs. And that’s just a very visible example. For the next two years while I’m here, I’ll have the chance to explore this in greater depth. Though I’ll be living in what’s considered one of the country’s most cosmopolitan cities, I’ll have access to friends serving in less fancy areas. Just how big is the urban/rural divide here, and how does each side to this debate view the other? In a time when nothing is taken for granted, (corporate sponsored school textbooks – Patriot Acts – the Right nation under God J.C. – gay marriage – terror – terror – terror,) what’s a country like Romania to do?

Thus I enter this existential fray, coming first from a place locked in a very different kind of battle, and before that, a great country uncertain about what it stands for anymore. I’m sure that the threads of these tapestries intertwine more so than I can even imagine yet, and that to untangle one from the others is an exercise in futility. But that doesn’t mean that comprehension is an impossible task. No, rather comprehension is a constant process of learning, one for which I feel well prepared.

La revedere,

1 thought on “It’s a small world after all..

  1. Chris

    I think it’s better to have a state with some inequality, where people at least aren’t prohibited from being successful, than a state where everyone lives in a forced state of equality and the options are few. I wonder how good the good old days actually were. I know nothing about the history of Romania itself, but I know that people have a tendency to romanticize the past in the face of an uneasy present and future, and forget the old problems for the new ones. Were people really happy owning nothing? Being poor? Being heavily restricted in what they could do with their lives? I highly doubt they were.

    I can imagine that the older Romanians have adjusted their expectations of life to the limitations of the system they lived in for decades. I bet it sucks to be driving some Soviet-era jalopy and seeing the guy across the street in his new SUV. But if those people had had a chance when they were young, to have more opportunities and, yes, more things, they would have jumped at it.

    Ever read the story “Harrison Bergeron”, by Kurt Vonnegut? It’s pretty silly, but it’s a rather chilling take on what happens when a society attempts to artificially suppress all stratification.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *