President Obama has selected Steve Chu to be Energy Secretary. Chu is a seriously brilliant scientist and economist. In 2007, he served on the “Committee on Prospering in the Global Economy of the 21st Century,” which was created in response to the following Congressional query:
What are the top 10 actions, in priority order, that federal policymakers could take to enhance the science and technology enterprise so that the United States can successfully compete, prosper, and be secure in the global community of the 21st century? What strategy, with several concrete steps, could be used to implement each of those actions?
The report (of which I’ve only read the Executive Summary,) outlines major investments to be made by the Federal Government into math and science research in this country. Some hilights of the proposal include:
- Establish a national launching program for scientists by fully funding a launching program with a teaching requirement… ($20K/yr for 4 years in exchange for five years in public K-12 schools.)
- Increase federal investment in research with an emphasis on physical sciences, engineering, mathamatics, information sciences and DOD.
- Create in the DOE an agency modeled off of DARPA called ARPA-E… (Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy.)
- Reform patent system… make things more inclusive/logical.
In support of these recommendations, the report presents some interesting statistics from a variety of disciplines. Some that caught my eye:
- General Motors spends more on healthcare than on steel.
- Chemical companies closed 70 facilities in the United States in 2004 and tagged 40 more for shutdown. Of 120 chemical plants being built around the world with price tags of $1 billion or more, one is in the United States and 50 are in China. No new refineries have been built in the United
States since 1976. - A company can hire nine factory workers in Mexico for the cost of one in America. A company can hire eight young professional engineers in India for the cost of one in America.
- The United States ranks only 12th among OECD countries in the number of broadband connections per 100 inhabitants.
- American youth spend more time watching television than in school.
- In 2001, US industry spend more on tort litigation than on research.
- “We go where the smart people are. Now our business operations are two-thirds in the U.S. and one-third overseas. But that ratio will flip over the next ten years.†—Intel Corporation spokesman Howard High
All in all not not a rosy picture. However the report is hopeful and coherent, and I strongly support it. I am particularly interested in the ARPA-E aspect of the project. That led me over to http://science.house.gov where I found out that the project had been signed into law on August 9th, 2007. Selections from the bill:
- This section establishes the Advanced Research Projects Agency – Energy (ARPA-E) within the Department of Energy. Similar to the Department of Defense’s Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), this new organizational structure will support revolutionary and transformational energy research where risk and pay offs are high.
- ARPA-E shall be headed by a Director, appointed by the Secretary.
- Funds may be used for activities in any stage of the innovation spectrum from early-stage basic research to late-stage demonstration. A special emphasis should be placed on activities that serve to bridge between these stages and, ultimately, across the “valley of death†to commercial applications of the technologies.
- As with DARPA, the Director of ARPA-E will have special authority to hire program managers and other technical, managerial, and financial staff for limited terms, and at a salary commensurate with what such staff would expect to make in the private sector.
This is all part of the America COMPETES Act, the fruition of the work of Chu and the other members of the committee. Now that Chu is Energy Secretary, he will be able to appoint the Director of ARPA-E. What will be interesting to watch is how the development of this program unfolds. Since DARPA brought us the internet, one can only hope that ARPA-E will be able to deliver as revolutionary a result. This is a great step forward (likely cemented by Al Gore,) that shows a real commitment to create a 21st Century energy infrastructure that will be the envy of the world and the engine of our economy.
Generally, I don’t endorse forcing people into teaching anymore as the price to pay for a cut-rate education.
It’s bad enough to have thick Chinese, Indian, and Russian accents (let alone actual language and cultural barriers, or a complete lack of basic teaching skills) turning off 18 year old minds bright enough to make it to college, in survey courses, let alone the average uninterested, lazy, and often at risk high school teenager.
First we’re eventually going to have to accept what the rest of the First World has already realized: to get quality math and science education (and humanities for that matter,) there is simply going to have to be meritocratic pay, or at least a higher payscale than that available for elementary and early childhood education. People with advanced degrees, good teachers or not, will simply not pay the opportunity cost of the job they COULD have elsewhere.
Secondly, teaching K-12 has always been demeaning, lowly work, which is why (aside from nursing,) it was the only white collar “profession” available to women before the 70s. It is at root a cultural problem. Teaching K-12 in America is simply degrading, and you know I speak from experience.
That said, funding is important. It should probably involve only colleges and corporate R&D grants, however.
The crash energy program could do well if the international patent issues are handled in our favor. I still suspect that Honda and Toyota will make better vehicles with the technology than the Big 3, however.
The broadband figure is a red herring. We have more square area to cover with fiber optic cable than any of the OECD countries. Signal integrity is inversely proportional to distance traveled. It will take time, but we will get there.
Outsourcing is a serious issue, and though I’m generally anti-tariff, products produced by labor drainers may be a case worthy of protectionism. Bear in mind this important fact: Indian students have been advancing on the American taxpayer’s dollar. Every foreign student who receives a free graduate education by doing teaching asst.ships takes advantage of this literally at state schools, and indirectly through tax exemption at the private ones. American colleges and their precious enrollment spots are a national resource to which no non-resident deserves equal access over those on whose backs it was built. We are literally paying to make these people competitive, and eroding our own citizens opportunities.
That rant was hammered out late last night, and though I don’t recant the sentiments, my style and grammar left something to be desired. 🙁