Category Archives: Foolish Designs

The Purpose of SUVs

So I’ve finally figured it out. It’s all about the Christmas tree. Today on the way home from work, I passed no less than 5 giant SUV’s with Christmas trees on top of them. And I’m not talking the little wannabe SUVs, I’m taking the big time suburban fuck you where’s my gas SUVs. And when I thought about it, it makes perfect sense. What better a way to prove one’s MASCULINITY than to tie a DEAD TREE to the top of one’s SUV. No embarrassing driving with the tree sticking out of an open trunk. No, with the mega SUV, you OWN Nature. So BOOYAH!

Quality Construction

I worked once with Habitat for Humanity. Why only once? Two reasons. One, I was too busy, and two, the quality of the housing being built for these people sucked. Now, today I go clicking over to the Globe to find this article on the Big Dig. As it turns out, all the tunnels have major structural flaws and will have to be repaired at what will undoubtedly be tremendous costs. Read the article HERE.

After this disspaointing and, frankly, enraging article, I decided to visit Nate’s website. He had a particularly good editorial linking his personal goings on with the fate of something called the High Line Railroad in Manhattan. I remember hearing about this a while back, but thanks to Nate’s article, I re-discovered the project’s amazing website. Click HERE to check it out.

What’s interesting about these two seemingly unrelated incidents is Quality. The High Line, built from 1929 – 1934, is still standing today, and is in fact strong enough to begin its second life as a unique public park. The Big Dig, which consisted of a construction period of roughly 15 years, is now just being completed (though anyone who actualy drives in Boston would harken to qualify the meaning of “complete.”) Anyway, it has now been discovered that large and critical sections of the project will have to be re-built! And it’s brand new!

So, over 75 years later, though our technical know how has increased, the quality of our work has decreased. Whereas the High Line will soon begin its new life, the new Central Artery Tunnels will already be undergoing major structural repairs. It’s a sad commentary on the nature of worksmanship and the larger ideal of public works projects in this country.

Guest Entry

___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________

RR Xing – No Horns

A quick rant before I run off to watch the red sox at yankee stadium…

In both of today’s Boston papers, there is a story about a kid who was hit and killed by a commuter train in a suburban town. In the Globe, the story focuses on the fact that, to preserve the quiet of suburbia, many towns have disallowed trains to blow their horns at railroad crossings. Because of this accident, the clamor is now about reversing this trend, and forcing trains to toot at every grade crossing. In the other “paper,” the Herald, the debate was about speed, with clamor for trains to slow down to about 1/3 normal operating speed at all grade crossings.

Now, we happen to live nearby a street which is crossed by tracks for the commuter rail. As a driver, I’m frequently forced to stop as the train passes. As a rider of said train, I enjoy the relatively speedy trip downtown. Now, before a train ever crosses the road, lights flash, gates are lowered, and bells ding. I’ve been taught that when the gates go down, the bells ding and the lights flash, that a train is coming, possibly at high speeds.

I’m sorry about this unfortunate accident, however, I think that both articles completely missed the point. Trains should not have to slow down at every grade crossing; that would make for an arduously long trip. Also, trains should not have to blow their horns at every crossing; this would be legitimately annoying for those living near such crossings. The problem is not in the way the trains are run, rather the parenting of children.

I was taught way back when that when the lights flash and the gate comes down, you stop, wait for the train to pass, and then continue. I was also taught not to walk along active railroad tracks. These two lessons are ones which every parent should impart to his/her children. And, if need be, that child should be shown pictures of those whose last decision was to ignore one of those lessons.

I’m tired of the railroads being blamed for things which are not their fault. Had the gate malfunctioned, it would be another story entirely, but such was not the case. Although we all like safe environments (especially those of us living out in suburbia,) we have got to take responsibility for it ourselves. If a kid, having been told to look before crossing the street, does not, and is hit by a car traveling the speed limit, is the driver at fault? No. And any sane parent will tell his/her kid to look both ways. So instead of blaming incidents such as this on the evil trains, how about taking responsibility for a grave mistake.

A Necessity or Profiteering?

In one of my many trips into cyberspace, I came across an individual who noted that she was taking a course at Curry College in Terrorism. This, of course, struck me as amusing. Is Curry College an evil syndicate of al Qaeda? Had this women singlehandedly blown the cover of an American insurgent network? Well, as usual, my mind was getting the best of me, and such was not the case.

What I did find, however, was just as fascinating. Curry College is one of those many lower tier New England Liberal Arts schools. In order to be more competitive, it offers a myriad of courses, namely a continuing education program. One of the certificate programs in this lineup is called “Homeland Defense.”

In response to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the Certificate in Homeland Defense was designed to prepare traditional and continuing studies undergraduates and law enforcement practitioners to meet the new challenges of homeland security.

To complete the program, an individual must take eight courses.

I’m split on this one. On the one hand, we certainly want individuals trained to deal with this new terrorist threat. On the other, however, the idea that Curry College is profitting off of 9/11 leaves a bad taste in my mouth. What are your thoughts on this?

Link:
http://www.curry.edu/Academics/Continuing+Education/
Certificate+Programs/Homeland+Defense.htm