Matty Meowy

My route to and from school takes me past this abandoned house, which, in New Orleans, is not unusual. A few weeks ago I spotted a cat underneath the neighboring house, and though I didn’t get a great look at it, it seemed to be matted and dirty. Since that first sighting, I hadn’t seen it again… until today.

At first I figured that it was just a matter of timing; my daily schedule is hardly ever the same. But when I thought back to the first time I saw it and then to today, I realized that both times I noticed a car pulling out of the abandoned house’s driveway. In both instances the mystery cat poked out from under the neighbor’s house, and today, she even came out completely. The poor thing has bushy wild hair and is indeed quite dirty. I bent down to pet it, but it got spooked, so I just stood still and slowly it came up to me.

While this cat may be just one of many feral cats in the city, a part of me wonders if it used to belong to the now abandoned house. Perhaps whenever it hears a car in the driveway it pokes out expectantly, hoping, perhaps, that its long lost master has returned. While I probably won’t ever know what happened at that abandoned house, I can’t help but speculating about this dirty kitty and its sad fate.

We The Bechtel

The Supreme Court has just released a very important decision which regards corporate financing of political advertising. Below, I’m embedding and attaching a version of the decision which I have hilighted. Given that the actual document is very long, and would take a few hours to read, I have provided this hilighted version so that you may quickly pick up all the salient points. My hilighting is limited to the majority’s opinion, pp. 1 – 57, and then the dissent, pp. 81 – 170 of the document.

Yes, I know I’m a law student, and I read cases all the time, but to those of you who are not law students, I’d like to encourage you to take a look at my hilights of this very important case. When’s the last time you read a Supreme Court opinion anyway?

The majority basically said that the First Amendment prohibits a ban on political advertisements funded by corporate money. The dissent claims that the major corrupting potential of such advertising subverts the very principles which the First Amendment seeks to protect. Make no mistake; this is a case about the very fundamental values of our political system.

I hope you will take a look at what I have hilighted. I’ve attempted to draw your attention to enough background so that you will have a deeper understanding of each side’s best arguments. If you are going to read the document in the embedded Google Docs viewer, I recommend that you click the full screen icon in the top right… the resulting reading experience is much better. You may also download the file and read it in your preferred PDF viewer.

Direct Download – [PDF]

WA WA WA WA

Sorry for keeping a picture of my dinner on the front page for so long! I’ve been consumed with finals and have been severely neglecting this site. In the works: essay on the former Audubon Park Natatorium, restored photo galleries and guest entries. For now, a few pictures from my trip to Seattle and Walla Walla, WA.