Category Archives: Public Agencies

High Drama on the High Plains

hardin downtownHardin, Montana, population approximately 3,500, situated on the remote northern Great Plains, not far from Little Bighorn.

Like countless other small towns, Hardin’s fortunes have waned as traditional industries have become less profitable or simply moved on.

In 2004 the city created the Two River Authority (TRA), a quasi-governmental economic development agency charged with creating jobs. TRA’s first project was the construction of a prison in conjunction with Corplan Corrections Inc., a Texas company that specializes in pushing detention centers on economically desperate small towns. The Hardin prison was touted as a no brainer; Montana had a growing inmate population and shortage of prisons. Convinced that a new facility would be quickly filled, TRA obtained $27.4 in revenue bonds for the new detention center. The bonds were to be repaid from the prison’s revenues and did not cost the taxpayers a dime.

By 2007 the jail was complete. There was, however, one small problem… it had no inmates. Relations between the TRA and the State of Montana had soured; the state was now claiming that there had never been any deal to house prisoners in the facility.

Community Education Centers, a for-profit prison corporation, and the jail’s preliminary operator, began to seek inmates from out-of-state. But when the Montana attorney general put the breaks on this plan, TRA was forced to take the case to court. A year later, the court granted TRA’s request to seek prisoners from beyond Montana’s borders; surely some states had extra prisoners in need of a new home. Even the new governor of Montana, skeptical of the program from the start, lent a hand, inviting officials from neighboring states, Indian tribes and the federal government to tour the facility. But none were impressed, and the jail sat empty; even the for-profit prison management corporation figured it was time to get out of town. TRA had built it, but nobody had come.

And so set in the desperation. First, upon hearing of President Obama’s plans to close Guantanamo, TRA began to pitch the facility as the ideal place to house the displaced enemy combatants. These efforts garnered international attention and led to such an outcry by Montana residents that state officials stepped and indicated that no such deal would be forthcoming. Though the Guantanamo plan ultimately failed, the media storm surrounding it had succeeded in broadcasting the woes of Hardin to the world. It was now mid-2009; the jail had been empty for over two years.

HiltonEnter Michael Hilton, President of the American Police Force (APF). Hilton, who prefers to be called “Captain Michael,” approached the TRA and explained that his company was eager to run the jail and build a large special-forces training center on adjacent land. APF (unlike Blackwater (Xe), DynCorp, or CACI) is a relative newcomer to the private security racket. Its militaristic website boasts a wide array of services, including: Special Forces Training, Convoy Security, and, until it was recently removed, International Arms Sales (including WMDs). In mid-August, 2009, APF and TRA signed an agreement stating that APF would operate the jail.

From the beginning, APF’s plans were met with skepticism. After Hardin city officials stated that prisoners from California would be housed in the facility, California officials responded that no such agreement had been made. Likewise, though APF claimed that the federal government was it biggest client, no trace of it could be found in federal contractor databases. Local media outlets, seeking information about APF’s operations, were denied any information, ostensibly for security reasons. Hardin residents were of two minds about the city’s potential benefactor; while some eagerly hoped to cash in on the promised job opportunities, others were beginning to question the legitimacy of the entire deal.

Montana JailOn September 24, 2009, APF came to Hardin, arriving in three black Mercedes SUVs emblazoned with “City of Hardin Police Department” decals. There was only one problem… the City of Hardin did not have a police department; the County Sheriff’s office was responsible for law enforcement within the city. Though TRA authorities attempted to assure a jittery populace that APF’s contract was limited to operation of the jail and training facility, the damage had been done. Though the decals were promptly removed, citizens who had been following this saga at arm’s length were suddenly up in arms.

Following APF’s inflammatory entry, it did little to endear itself to an increasingly skeptical population, refusing to reveal its parent company, financial backers or from where it would collect inmates for the facility. This excessive shroud of secrecy prompted detailed investigations by local and national media into APF and Hilton, its elusive and tight lipped leader. The results were stunning, though to many, hardly shocking. In 1993, Hilton had plead guilty to 14 felonies, including 10 counts of grant theft. He had been named as a defendant in multiple cases alleging fraud, breach of contract and breach of warranty. He had declared multiple bankruptcies, and, the coup de gras, had gone by over a dozen aliases. Hardin, it seemed, had been conned.

The Montana Attorney General got involved again, seeking answers to many of the same questions both wary citizens and dogged journalists had posed. Montana’s Governor went on the record stating that the people of Hardin had been duped, not just by APF, but by Corplan into building the white elephant in the first place.

Then, on October 9th, just two weeks after APF first rolled in to Hardin, it backed right out. The official reason given for cancelling the contract involved unforeseen costs associated with replacing an analog telephone system and damaged security cameras at the jail. But as details have emerged of Hilton’s pending court date in California regarding another scam gone awry, it seems clear that the jig is up.

Greg Smith IIAs if all of this is not interesting enough, there are two side-stories worth noting. The first concerns Greg Smith, former executive director of TRA. Just two days after TRA announced the deal with APF, Smith was placed on paid leave; to this date, no reason has been given for his suspension. Smith’s wife, Kerri, is currently a finalist in the city’s mayoral race. Hilton had stated on record that he advised Kerri to call him about a job with APF should her bid for mayor be unsuccessful. On October 5th, in a closed door meeting, Greg Smith formally resigned from TRA.

ShayThe second mini-drama involves Becky Shay, a former reporter with the Billings Gazette and APF’s current spokesman. Shay abruptly quit her job with the Gazette the day after APF arrived in Hardin, morphing quickly from reporter to stonewaller. In a press conference held days before the deal fell apart, Shay broke down in tears multiple times. It is unclear whether Shay will remain as APF’s spokesman or if her first paycheck will clear.

There’s more… the Billings Gazette has uncovered that the original agreement, ostensibly regarding the jail, also contained a clause which might explain the “Hardin Police Department” SUVs. TRA granted APF the right to submit a proposal to provide police services to the city. Indeed, the concern about private mercenaries patrolling the streets of Hardin under the color of law constituted the bulk of early rumors surrounding the whole deal.

So what’s the moral to this story? Is it just a sad case of desperate people getting conned? Corrupt local politics? That’s part of it, but there’s more going on here. This saga speaks to the moral and visionary bankruptcy of modern America. An economically depressed town pins its future hopes on a prison, peddled by a private corporation seeking to profit from increased incarceration. A simple fact about corporations is that they must grow to survive and please their stakeholders. Corporations in the business of constructing or managing prisons want more Americans behind bars, and will work towards that goal. A strange video slideshow (archived – download and open in browser) on the TRA website presents the Hardin jail as a wonderful place just waiting to be brought to life. But a prison is hardly a place of great promise; we should be ashamed that incarceration is one of our few remaining growth industries. Prisons should not be for-profit.

And how about civics? Privatizing Hardin’s police force is against the Montana constitution, but this is just what TRA seemed to have had in the works.

What about the glorification of militarism? APF’s website attempts to impress with dark colors, rousing music, and pictures of soldiers, weapons and war machines. When did war become chic, rather than the nightmare that it is?

And how about due diligence? How could TRA and city leaders go on record day after day praising APF when simple investigations would have revealed information that ought to have given any reasonable person pause?

But there’s an upside too. The public unraveling of APF in Hardin was fostered by a combination of traditional and new media. Local television stations and newspapers reported on the story as it unfolded while investigative blogs and personal bloggers spread the story around the internet. Some good investigative journalism happened here, without which, Hardin, Montana might just have been duped, once again.

Sources:

The New Blackwater

Blackwater has a new name and look. The infamous security company has been given a makeover, and if I’m correct, most Americans will forget.

Former:
blackwater

Current:
blackwater-redux

From a design perspective, the new website has a much lighter background, and the main area has a white background. As if to escape the old name decisively, the webmaster sought to abolish the “black” from Blackwater. The new design makes me feel like I’m floating in some underwater mario world. I still find the new site sinister, however, thanks in large part to the surveillance blimp hovering above.

If you have read Jeremy Scahill’s book Blackwater, you are aware that the company’s founder, Erik Prince, is an extremely wealthy and powerful Dominionist. Taking this into account, I noticed two features of the new website that seem to be coded references to this fact. First, the logo of the new company, “XeServices LLC,” is itself very cross-like. If you can’t see that, just tilt your head 45⁰ to the left. Also, on the “About Us” page, one of the images used in that page is this:
blackwater-chopper

Maybe I am reading too much in to things, but this latest story in The Nation makes me feel otherwise. It appears that Mr. Prince may have ordered killed individuals who had provided or were going to provide the federal government with information regarding Blackwater’s criminal activities. In sum, Blackwater operatives knowingly committed war crimes and were enabled by a complicit federal government.

Stay tuned…

ARPA-E

President Obama has selected Steve Chu to be Energy Secretary. Chu is a seriously brilliant scientist and economist. In 2007, he served on the “Committee on Prospering in the Global Economy of the 21st Century,” which was created in response to the following Congressional query:

What are the top 10 actions, in priority order, that federal policymakers could take to enhance the science and technology enterprise so that the United States can successfully compete, prosper, and be secure in the global community of the 21st century? What strategy, with several concrete steps, could be used to implement each of those actions?

The report (of which I’ve only read the Executive Summary,) outlines major investments to be made by the Federal Government into math and science research in this country. Some hilights of the proposal include:

  1. Establish a national launching program for scientists by fully funding a launching program with a teaching requirement… ($20K/yr for 4 years in exchange for five years in public K-12 schools.)
  2. Increase federal investment in research with an emphasis on physical sciences, engineering, mathamatics, information sciences and DOD.
  3. Create in the DOE an agency modeled off of DARPA called ARPA-E… (Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy.)
  4. Reform patent system… make things more inclusive/logical.

In support of these recommendations, the report presents some interesting statistics from a variety of disciplines. Some that caught my eye:

  1. General Motors spends more on healthcare than on steel.
  2. Chemical companies closed 70 facilities in the United States in 2004 and tagged 40 more for shutdown. Of 120 chemical plants being built around the world with price tags of $1 billion or more, one is in the United States and 50 are in China. No new refineries have been built in the United
    States since 1976.
  3. A company can hire nine factory workers in Mexico for the cost of one in America. A company can hire eight young professional engineers in India for the cost of one in America.
  4. The United States ranks only 12th among OECD countries in the number of broadband connections per 100 inhabitants.
  5. American youth spend more time watching television than in school.
  6. In 2001, US industry spend more on tort litigation than on research.
  7. “We go where the smart people are. Now our business operations are two-thirds in the U.S. and one-third overseas. But that ratio will flip over the next ten years.” —Intel Corporation spokesman Howard High

All in all not not a rosy picture. However the report is hopeful and coherent, and I strongly support it. I am particularly interested in the ARPA-E aspect of the project. That led me over to http://science.house.gov where I found out that the project had been signed into law on August 9th, 2007. Selections from the bill:

  1. This section establishes the Advanced Research Projects Agency – Energy (ARPA-E) within the Department of Energy. Similar to the Department of Defense’s Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), this new organizational structure will support revolutionary and transformational energy research where risk and pay offs are high.
  2. ARPA-E shall be headed by a Director, appointed by the Secretary.
  3. Funds may be used for activities in any stage of the innovation spectrum from early-stage basic research to late-stage demonstration. A special emphasis should be placed on activities that serve to bridge between these stages and, ultimately, across the “valley of death” to commercial applications of the technologies.
  4. As with DARPA, the Director of ARPA-E will have special authority to hire program managers and other technical, managerial, and financial staff for limited terms, and at a salary commensurate with what such staff would expect to make in the private sector.

This is all part of the America COMPETES Act, the fruition of the work of Chu and the other members of the committee. Now that Chu is Energy Secretary, he will be able to appoint the Director of ARPA-E. What will be interesting to watch is how the development of this program unfolds. Since DARPA brought us the internet, one can only hope that ARPA-E will be able to deliver as revolutionary a result. This is a great step forward (likely cemented by Al Gore,) that shows a real commitment to create a 21st Century energy infrastructure that will be the envy of the world and the engine of our economy.

Obama inspires a little theorizing.

Tomorrow I take my first law school exam. Yay. In other news, I am very pleased with what Obama had to say about the automobile industry. He was tough on ‘government oversight,’ and clear about protecting the people (we’re largely less well off these days if you haven’t noticed.)

I like the way he speaks (except for the clearly affected dropped g’s (who’d of thunk?) For instance, he used the term ‘fleet’ while discussing the American automobile industry. Fleet is a technical, if somewhat militaristic term. Talk to any transportation buff and you’ll soon end up in a discussion about the fleet. Fleet is rolling stock, ‘rolling’ of course in a very Ike & Tina style. The kicker is that America is far behind at this level.

Example: While I was in the Peace Corps in Romania, CFR (the Romanian national railroad,) greatly expanded its offerings of IC level trains. IC is a European train standard for longer distance express trains (both domestic and international,) which mandates certain levels of service. Many Western countries have express interstate systems (more or less,) through their high speed rail-lines. Romania was not yet there but it was getting massive new tracking, electrical infrastructure and trainsets.

Fast forward two years to a trip from New York to New Orleans by rail. The only upgrade from cattle car coach is overnight accommodation. Unless you get a full size bedroom (which runs in the hundreds,) you get a ‘roomette.’ … Pause… time out… since when was it fashionable to brand anything with the suffix ‘ette’ ? That’s right, maybe the early to mid 1970’s, right when most of passenger rail was jettisoned by the freight carriers into an agency run by an inherently hostile governmental regime. The result was, now with apparent parallel in Detroit, lack of innovation; grudging governmental management sold with a side of diminishing returns. The American fleet is out of date. Remember how the Enterprise would sometimes come upon far more primitive species and its ships?

Since Obama is wise, he articulates that our national concept of our fleet must range beyond our military apparatus. While military driven hardware is an important segment of our fleet that generates great (and frightening) technologies, it can not be nurtured at the cost of the rest of the fleet.

3 Basic Components:

Rail – Huge re-conceptualization of the role of modern rail networks in our urban and inter-urban infrastructure. Major city pairs need new tracks, for both freight and passenger. Don’t forget: the freight railroads dumped passenger service, it was not profitable! They are separate businesses and with some major outlays they can be separately tracked. A dedicated passenger network, perhaps funded by freight taxes, would be tremendously beneficial. First, massive heavy labor public works. Creating major electrified railroads is an extremely labor intensive endeavor. The system will be a stimulus to alternative energy, perhaps through a mandate to meet X% of the system’s energy needs through region-appropriate renewables. Second, it would encourage widespread use of transportation systems that are much kinder to their surroundings. Major ancillary and wide reaching businesses implications.

Road – The Eisenhower Interstate System was a bold and not entirely unsuccessful project. I highly admire some of our major pre-interstate highways (such as Moses’ feeder Parkways in New York and Connecticut.) They were bold and radical by betting on our adoption of the automobile. Some interstates are also very important, especially for large states and regions with scattered urban and rural population centers. However, all this connectivity has its downsides; sprawl has ruined much of the interstate experience. Interstates are not kind to local enterprise, especially in urban cores. While highways were sold as great connectors, they instead became great dividers… observe the relationship between highways and public housing projects. They decreased the quality of the urban experience thereby fostering the increasing ghettoization of American urban cores.

The suburb was triumphal piece of propaganda that spoke to a real need. The problem was that it just kept going; there was no master plan, so things just sprawled. We now face an interesting demographic shift. Urban, somewhat more collective an efficient living will command a premium. Some cities will shape a nice mix: Seattle, San Francisco, Denver, Boston. Others, such as New Orleans and Las Vegas, may end up as a kind of Terry Gilliam / Mike Davis hybrid city of the future. My observation, (which I stated earlier in response to a Newsweek column dedicated to the indulgences of the nouveau-billionaire class,) is that extreme bifurcation is detrimental to any system. Though I have never been to Vegas and I have only lived in New Orleans for six months, I imagine that they might be somewhat similar in terms of fate if not character. In both, tourism is a primary engine of the economy; tourism, however, is a notoriously poor contributor to civic vitality. These cities often have grand urban cores, or at least some stately areas. These areas are often developed as privately run high security havens for the super-rich. This militarization of public space eschews a human scale and thus discourages civic interaction (just take a look at ‘brutalist’ style concrete plazas and terraces from buildings of the 1960s.) This bifurcation between indulgent fantasy and grinding poverty is an illness, and particularly un-American.

Wow, that was tangential, got to remind myself not to do that tomorrow! The point I was getting at is that road and rail are both integral to our infrastructure but must re-negotiate some precious spaces.

Fleet – So let’s have at it! Develop an electric automobile fleet with battery changing stations and strive to improve that battery technology exponentially. Lay new track and develop new rail systems which help lessen our over-dependence on the car and cheap air. And, yes, let’s still build the best damn commercial airliners. We must and can be competitive on all three fronts, but it’s going to take some pretty radical restructuring, especially for all you former Reagan Democrats. If done well, this basic stimulus will do much to improve both our operating efficiency and quality of life.

The Whole World (ok maybe Country) is Watching

The President has declared an emergency exists in the State of Louisiana and ordered Federal aid to supplement State and local response efforts due to the emergency conditions resulting from Hurricane Gustav beginning on August 27, 2008, and continuing.

The President’s action authorizes the Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), to coordinate all disaster relief efforts which have the purpose of alleviating the hardship and suffering caused by the emergency on the local population, and to provide appropriate assistance for required emergency measures, authorized under Title V of the Stafford Act, to save lives, protect property and public health and safety, or to lessen or avert the threat of a catastrophe in all parishes within the State.

Specifically, FEMA is authorized to identify, mobilize, and provide, at its discretion, equipment and resources necessary to alleviate the impacts of the emergency. Emergency protective measures, including direct Federal assistance, will be provided at 75 percent Federal funding.

R. David Paulison, Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Department of Homeland Security, named Michael J. Hall as the Federal Coordinating Officer for Federal recovery operations in the affected area.

^-^-||||~

Here is my understanding of Title V of the Stafford Act:

Sec 501 – Declaration of Emergency
a) Governor must make request. Can make request when scope of disaster exceeds the resources of state and local concerns. Request must be specific and clearly state assets available. “Based on such a request, President may declare that a state of emergency exists.”

b) President may also declare such a state of emergency (minus the governor’s ask,) should he feel that responsibility for a response lies with the Federal government…

Sec 502 – Provision of assistance

President may:

a) order all Federal agencies to utilize all available resources (including labor) to support state/local efforts.

b) coordinate all efforts

c) provide assistance (this one is worth expanding… references another section of act – see footnote)

d) remove debris (I wonder if this is an oldie here)

e) provide aid

Sec 503 – Let’s talk $$$

“Federal share – The Federal share for assistance provided under this title shall be equal to not less than 75 percent of the eligible costs. 5 Million dollar limit which may be exceeded if President sees fit and reports to Congress

** That pesky but important footnote on what kind of aid to individuals may be provided

President may provide assistance to those unable to help themselves. May not discriminate against person / household with a loan out from the Small Business Administration or any other federal administration.

Housing Assistance:

financial – temporary housing stipends can be paid based on fair market value. Will also pay for utilities (except telephone service ?)

direct – President may buy or lease housing units and provide them to displaced individuals / 18 month limit excepting extraordinary circumstances / after 18 months, fair marked value can be charged for temporary housing units/relocation

owner occupied private residences eligible for repair and hazard mitigation services.

“may not waive any provision of Federal law requiring the purchase of flood insurance as a condition of the receipt of Federal disaster assistance”

Medical Assistance:

provide dental / medical / funeral assistance to affected individuals

Costs:

IMPT: Federal share here 100%

approx max $25,000 per person / household

at the very end, a bit about verification of use of funds (fraud avoidance.)